Child mortality is a case in point. For example, even in the prosperous United States, child mortality is extraordinarily high in places, such as Harlem -- higher than in Bangladesh. It is very low in prosperous areas.
My basic question, Brad, relates to this use of averages without an taking into account the inequalities that they obscure.
But infant mortality is a lot lower now than it was a century ago, right? Both because (as Jim Devine correctly points out) of governments doing a much better job with public health, and because of improvements in material standards of living, right?
Brad DeLong
- Re: reparations, (continued)
- Re: reparations, Jim Devine Fri 11 Feb 2000, 16:16 GMT
- Re: Re: reparations, Brad De Long Fri 11 Feb 2000, 16:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: reparations, Michael Perelman Fri 11 Feb 2000, 17:13 GMT
- Re: Re: child mortality, Joel Blau Fri 11 Feb 2000, 17:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: reparations, Brad De Long Fri 11 Feb 2000, 19:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: reparations, Michael Hoover Fri 11 Feb 2000, 20:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reparations, Michael Hoover Fri 11 Feb 2000, 20:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: reparations, Jim Devine Fri 11 Feb 2000, 17:19 GMT
- Re: Re: reparations, Roger Odisio Fri 11 Feb 2000, 19:02 GMT