PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: Keeping focus after the WTO
"Labor-intensive industries" aren't progressive in social terms, are they?
Yoshie
>>>>>>>>>
Labor-intensive per se is neutral.
Labor could be high- or low-paid. Software production
is labor intensive, but often high-paid. So is the
work of a symphony orchestra.
US agriculture is capital-intensive, if you don't count
Perelman, but obviously low-paid in many cases.
mbs
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Is Authoritarianism Necessary for Equality? (RE:: Keeping focus after the WTO, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Is Authoritarianism Necessary for Equality? (RE:: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Jim Devine Mon 13 Dec 1999, 21:59 GMT
- Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Carrol Cox Sun 12 Dec 1999, 18:34 GMT
- RE: Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Nathan Newman Sun 12 Dec 1999, 19:04 GMT
- Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 12 Dec 1999, 19:31 GMT
- RE: Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Max B. Sawicky Sun 12 Dec 1999, 20:08 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Michael Perelman Sun 12 Dec 1999, 21:38 GMT
- Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Rod Hay Sun 12 Dec 1999, 21:38 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Keeping focus after the WTO,
Ken Hanly Mon 13 Dec 1999, 01:53 GMT
- "freedom w/o equality.",
Jim Devine Mon 13 Dec 1999, 17:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]