It's a matter of emphasis, it's true. Actually, now that I think of it, what I objected to was your article's seemingly total allegiance to the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis. That theory, of course, is looking really bad these days.
Yep.
Brad DeLong
- Re: FYI, (continued)
- Re: FYI, Brad De Long Sat 11 Dec 1999, 00:43 GMT
- Re: Re: FYI, Jim Devine Sat 11 Dec 1999, 03:58 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: FYI, michael perelman Sat 11 Dec 1999, 04:16 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: FYI, Max B. Sawicky Sat 11 Dec 1999, 04:32 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: FYI, Brad De Long Sat 11 Dec 1999, 15:31 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: FYI, Jim Devine Sat 11 Dec 1999, 17:29 GMT
- Re: Re: FYI, Doug Henwood Sat 11 Dec 1999, 04:33 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: FYI, Brad De Long Sat 11 Dec 1999, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: FYI, Patrick Bond Sun 12 Dec 1999, 04:17 GMT