PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: R&D spending
How much of that is a substitute for public R&D?
Jim Devine wrote:
> According an article a friend gave me (which seems to be from BARRON'S),
> private-sector "R&D spending in the 1990s has been dramatically on the
> upswing" in the US.
>
> Is this true? (Doug?)
>
> also, isn't it true that US private-sector R&D spending has shifted toward
> more narrowly profit-promoting projects, away from more basic science?
>
> Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx & http://clawww.lmu.edu/~JDevine
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901
- Thread context:
- The Virtuosity of Economics,
michael perelman Sat 11 Dec 1999, 02:05 GMT
- (Fwd) Interview with Cai Chongguo, editor of China Labour Bull,
phillp2 Sat 11 Dec 1999, 02:04 GMT
- China Russia push multi-polar world,
Chris Burford Fri 10 Dec 1999, 23:00 GMT
- R&D spending,
Jim Devine Fri 10 Dec 1999, 22:36 GMT
- Nader news,
Jim Devine Fri 10 Dec 1999, 21:15 GMT
- EPI Reception at ASSA,
Max Sawicky Fri 10 Dec 1999, 20:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]