Jim Devine wrote:
Is Greenspan simply digging up numbers that have recently been provided by the BLS and using them to rationalize the failure of Phillips Curve models to predict inflation well? or have his economists developed a time-series going back to 1950 or 1960 of some alternative unemployment rate that they stick into a PC model that does predict inflation well?
I looked for the latter and found only that the Fed economists were attributing low inflation to the high profitability of business these days (as quoted in an earlier message). They were still using the usual official U rates.
I doubt Greenspan's working with a formal model - he's operationalizing Kalecki on the impossibility of full employment from the point of view of a central banker.
Doug
- Re: Re: pool of available workers, (continued)
- Re: Re: pool of available workers, Roger Odisio Thu 09 Dec 1999, 02:09 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: pool of available workers, Max B. Sawicky Thu 09 Dec 1999, 04:50 GMT
- Re: Re: pool of available workers, June Zaccone Thu 09 Dec 1999, 18:18 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: pool of available workers, Jim Devine Thu 09 Dec 1999, 18:32 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: pool of available workers, Doug Henwood Thu 09 Dec 1999, 19:03 GMT
- Re: Re: pool of available workers, Timework Web Thu 09 Dec 1999, 05:16 GMT
- Re: M-TH: What is value ?, Chris Burford Thu 09 Dec 1999, 00:06 GMT
- Re: Re: M-TH: What is value ?, phillp2 Thu 09 Dec 1999, 06:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: M-TH: What is value ?, Chris Burford Fri 10 Dec 1999, 20:57 GMT