PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Re: WTO
Doug wrote:
>
>I really don't understand this reasoning. Who's dictating to whom?
>U.S. union people are saying to listen to unions in the "developing"
>world. The AFL-CIO had at 7-10 unionists from Africa, Asia, and Latin
>America at their rally, all arguing for the right to organize and the
>principle of solidarity. We're talking basic labor rights, not a
>$12.50/hr global minimum wage. Is the spontaneous consciousness of
>intellectuals an anti-trade union consciousness?
Is it true that most or even many unions in the 'third' world generally
support the kind of labour/human rights/environment clauses that are
advanced through national and multilateral trade mechanisms by the rich
country governments? Can someone quote a few representative examples to
correct my perception that rich countries are seen to be the problem here,
not the solution?
Bill
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: WTO, (continued)
- Re: Re: WTO,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Dec 1999, 21:03 GMT
- WTO,
Louis Proyect Wed 08 Dec 1999, 21:24 GMT
- Re: WTO,
Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 09 Dec 1999, 00:16 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: WTO,
Bill Burgess Thu 09 Dec 1999, 06:41 GMT
- Re: Re: WTO,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Dec 1999, 21:19 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Capital Flows as E-Commerce, Shrimp and free trade,
Jim Devine Wed 08 Dec 1999, 19:26 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Capital Flows as E-Commerce, Shrimp and free trade,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Wed 08 Dec 1999, 20:07 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]