[PEN-L:11548] binary passions

To: Multiple recipients of list <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PEN-L:11548] binary passions
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:12:58 -0400

I don't understand why it's not possible to think that the
combination of internal changes within Europe plus imperialism
combined to produce capitalism as we know it. Why is such a
passionate matter of either/or dispute?

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- [PEN-L:11550] RE: binary passions
  - From: Max Sawicky

References:
- [PEN-L:11499] Re: Bairoch and the contribution of the colonies
  - From: Ricardo Duchesne

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:11547] RE: Re: wojtek
Next by Date: [PEN-L:11549] Re: Response to Darity
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:11532] Re: Re: Bairoch, etc.
Next by thread: [PEN-L:11550] RE: binary passions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11500] Re: Capitalist development, Ricardo Duchesne Wed 22 Sep 1999, 19:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:11499] Re: Bairoch and the contribution of the colonies, Ricardo Duchesne Wed 22 Sep 1999, 19:25 GMT
  - [PEN-L:11505] Re: Bairoch, etc., Bill Burgess Wed 22 Sep 1999, 20:39 GMT
    - [PEN-L:11532] Re: Re: Bairoch, etc., Brad De Long Thu 23 Sep 1999, 14:02 GMT
  - [PEN-L:11548] binary passions, Doug Henwood Thu 23 Sep 1999, 16:21 GMT
    - [PEN-L:11550] RE: binary passions, Max Sawicky Thu 23 Sep 1999, 16:42 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:11568] Re: RE: binary passions, Wojtek Sokolowski Thu 23 Sep 1999, 20:30 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:11570] RE: Re: RE: binary passions, Max Sawicky Thu 23 Sep 1999, 20:37 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:11572] Re: Re: RE: binary passions, Jim Devine Thu 23 Sep 1999, 20:43 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]