[PEN-L:11532] Re: Re: Bairoch, etc.

To: Multiple recipients of list <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PEN-L:11532] Re: Re: Bairoch, etc.
From: Brad De Long <delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 06:54:59 -0700

I'd like to say that while I can't follow every twist and turn in the
argument about Europe and the periphery, I am appreciating this thread
(when it stays on track).

But a question. For a different topic I am citing estimates of long-run
industrial output by Bairoch, as well as those by Angus Madison (OECD,
1995). Since some of you probably know this area well, any comments on how
good these estimates are, especially Bairoch's industrial output in
physical terms?

Bill Burgess


Lousy, lousy, lousy, lousy. Really lousy. Half-educated guesses...

But the best we have, and the best we are likely to get.

Brad DeLong

References:
- [PEN-L:11505] Re: Bairoch, etc.
  - From: Bill Burgess

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:11531] Re: Re: Marxist response to East Timor
Next by Date: [PEN-L:11533] Friedman comes to Oz
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:11505] Re: Bairoch, etc.
Next by thread: [PEN-L:11548] binary passions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11501] Re: Military technology, Ricardo Duchesne Wed 22 Sep 1999, 20:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:11500] Re: Capitalist development, Ricardo Duchesne Wed 22 Sep 1999, 19:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:11499] Re: Bairoch and the contribution of the colonies, Ricardo Duchesne Wed 22 Sep 1999, 19:25 GMT
  - [PEN-L:11505] Re: Bairoch, etc., Bill Burgess Wed 22 Sep 1999, 20:39 GMT
    - [PEN-L:11532] Re: Re: Bairoch, etc., Brad De Long Thu 23 Sep 1999, 14:02 GMT
  - [PEN-L:11548] binary passions, Doug Henwood Thu 23 Sep 1999, 16:21 GMT
    - [PEN-L:11550] RE: binary passions, Max Sawicky Thu 23 Sep 1999, 16:42 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:11568] Re: RE: binary passions, Wojtek Sokolowski Thu 23 Sep 1999, 20:30 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:11570] RE: Re: RE: binary passions, Max Sawicky Thu 23 Sep 1999, 20:37 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]