PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:11432] Re: Re: [Fwd: Fw: EH.R: Kondratieff Cycles]
>>> Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx> 09/21/99 02:06PM >>>
Charles Brown wrote:
>Charles: Some questions for the answers:
>
>Why is the whole region of East Asia looked at to determine whether
>there is a recession ? Maybe there was a recession in Indonesia but
>not one in China. Isn't one conventional defiintion something like
>negative growth for four or five straight quarters in one country ?
>Why is the period of measure a decade ?
It was Frank's choice, not mine. He claimed a decade-long world
depression. There's no evidence for that. The conventional definition
is two consecutive quarters of real decline in GDP in one country.
((((((((
Charles: I see
((((((((((
>Over the history of recording recession/depresions aren't some of
>them in individual countries and some world or regional ? One
>commentator says the first crisis of overproduction broke out in
>Britain in 1825. The 1847-48 crisis which embraced the U.S. and some
>European countries was the first world or regional crisis. Aren't
>crises of different geographical reaches and for different lengths
>,including a year or so, in length ? If the time period is
>stretched long enough and an average taken , most crises can be
>averaged away. This is especially so if the time period is stretched
>to a decade. Even the Great Depression of `1929 to 1933 might be
>averaged away if the decade is 1923 to 1933 ?
Yes, you're right. Ask Andre Gunder Frank why he chose to make the
period a decade.
((((((((((
Charles: I see. I'll send him a copy of this
((((((((((
>Can China, with a very mixed economy, be considered on a full
>capitalist business cycle ? Can its growth be credited to the world
>capitalist system ?
They've certainly become at least partly capitalist, have opened
partly to foreign investment, and depend heavily on exports for
growth.
(((((((((((
Charles: Isn't it interesting how China often breaks up the conventional categories, not just on this issue ,but many others.
CB
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11438] Re: Re: Response to Darity,
Mathew Forstater Tue 21 Sep 1999, 19:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:11437] Re: Re: Re: re: colonialism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:11435] Re: Re: slavery and capitalism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:11432] Re: Re: [Fwd: Fw: EH.R: Kondratieff Cycles],
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:11431] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: colonialism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:11429] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: colonialism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:11428] Re: Re: Re: Re: colonialism,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 18:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:11427] Re: Re: Capitalist development,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 17:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]