PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:11386] Re: Re: Re: Capitalist development
>>> Jim Devine <jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/20/99 05:18PM >>>Wojtek replies: >This was precisely the point I tried to make by objecting
to the "exploitationist" explanations of the European development. <
Somehow I missed this. I agree with the rest of what Wojtek said in his two
messages responding to mine.
((((((((((((((((
Charles: Jim, but isn't exploitation a term of art (science) in describing the extraction of surplus value from laborers ?
Also, note Marx's , the arch historical materialist's , extensive description of the role of force and violence in the origin of capitalism. Force is a material factor in the process, aside from its moral dimension.
CB
>>> Jim Devine <jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/20/99 05:18PM >>>
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11419] Re: Eurocentrism run amok: LM's defense of slavery, (continued)
- [PEN-L:11387] Re: Re: Re: Re: colonialism,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 04:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:11386] Re: Re: Re: Capitalist development,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 04:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:11385] Re: Re: Person work hours at the dawn ofcapitalism,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 04:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:11382] Re: Capitalist development,
James M. Blaut Tue 21 Sep 1999, 03:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:11381] why do we care?,
James M. Blaut Tue 21 Sep 1999, 03:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:11380] A forward on why they didn't ?,
Charles Brown Tue 21 Sep 1999, 03:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]