PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:9716] Re: Gen. Equilibrium
Doug, I can't tell from your post what you're taking issue with: that gen
eq was revived in the 1930s? That it was considered "everybody's
economics"? What? Gil
>Mark Blaug writes in Economic Theory in Retrospect (5th ed., p. 290):
>
>"Utility theory was gradually deprived of all its bite and reduced
>from cardinal to ordinal utility and from ordinal utility to
>'revealed preference'; cost theories of value were shown, not to be
>wrong, but only valid in special cases; and general equilbrium
>virtually disappeared by 1900, only to be revived in the 1930s by
>Hicks and Samuelson as 'everybody's economics....'"
>
>This isn't the story you get from Keynes or modern post-Keynesians;
>what's up here?
>
>Doug
>
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:9703] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bill McKibben, (continued)
- [PEN-L:9698] Gen. Equilibrium,
Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jul 1999, 02:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:9695] FW: Secret Govt paper residential schools (fwd),
Craven, Jim Wed 28 Jul 1999, 22:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:9694] FW: FW: Res-school Genocide = $ for lawyers,
Craven, Jim Wed 28 Jul 1999, 22:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:9693] FW: Letter to Sassy,
Craven, Jim Wed 28 Jul 1999, 22:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]