BLS DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999: An additional $200 a month or less in income would make it possible for 68 percent of the nation's working poor to meet their families' financial needs, according to findings drawn from "The Work Trends Survey," performed by the John L. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University and the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut. In order to obtain that $200, however, a worker paid the federal minimum wage of $5.15 per hour would need to work an extra 5 days per month -- one reason behind the study's recommendation that the minimum wage be raised to $6.15. The extra dollar would "significantly help" the working poor, or those who earn less than double the 1997 federally set poverty threshold, the study concludes. The study also recommends that government support increased access to child care and public transportation for the nation's working poor. ... The poll was compiled from a national sample of 500 adults in households making no more than double the federal poverty threshold of $25,640 for a family of three. ... The poll revealed that the typical working poor individual is a single white mother, 30 to 49 years old, who works one full-time job for 40 hours a week, and who earns less than $25,000 a year. She has a child under 18, has held her job for more than a year, receives little or no paid vacation, and has not received cash welfare. Seventy-one percent of the working poor are paid by the hour and have held their jobs for more than a year, the poll found, and 42 percent have had their jobs for more than 3 years. ... (Daily Labor Report, page A-4). Unions increasingly are seeking to negotiate contracts that reduce or eliminate mandatory overtime, according to several labor and management officials contacted by the Bureau of National Affairs. ... Workers feel that instead of hiring an adequate number of personnel, employers are cutting costs by forcing them to work overtime. ... (Daily Labor Report, page C-1). Home sales soared to a record rate in June as buyers rushed to take advantage of low mortgage rates, the National Association of Realtors said. Sales of existing homes rose 10.6 percent in June. The industry group said buyers moved into the market when they saw mortgage rates starting to rise (Washington Post, page E13; New York Times, page C7; Wall Street Journal, page A2). Government workers are older, on average, than their private-sector counterparts, says a new report by the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government in Albany, New York. Workers 45 to 64 years old account for 42 percent of the labor force in state, federal, and local government, the report says, compared with 28 percent in the private sector (Wall Street Journal's "Work Week" feature, page A1). After years of relatively flat health insurance rates, employers are suffering sticker shock, says USA Today (page 1B). ... It's the second consecutive year of significant insurance increases for many employers, who may have been able to shrug off the first time around but are now looking for solutions. The last time rates soared -- year after year of double-digit increases in the late 1980s -- employers flocked to managed care plans, which promised lower rates but also greater restrictions on care. Health inflation slowed for a while, but the dam burst last year. Two years of average premium increases of 7 to 11 percent or more is a signal to some that managed care has done much of what it can to trim costs. .... What are employers doing as premiums increase? 1. Changing benefit packages; 2. Shopping around for a better deal with a different insurer; 3. Increasing the amount employees pay toward their own or their dependents' coverage; 4. Sitting tight and paying up. ... DUE OUT TOMORROW: Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment: June 1999
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- [PEN-L:9679] Book Review, Charles Brown Wed 28 Jul 1999, 14:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:9678] The Internet Anti-Fascist: Fri, 23 July 99 -- 3:47 (#298), Paul Kneisel Wed 28 Jul 1999, 03:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:9674] FW: Dalai Lama/Today's Tibet, Craven, Jim Tue 27 Jul 1999, 23:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:9697] Re: FW: Dalai Lama/Today's Tibet, Jim Devine Thu 29 Jul 1999, 00:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:9672] BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 27 Jul 1999, 22:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:9671] any comments on this claim, Michael Perelman Tue 27 Jul 1999, 21:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:9670] FW: threats to native sovereigntists (fwd), Craven, Jim Tue 27 Jul 1999, 20:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:9666] Limitations, Craven, Jim Tue 27 Jul 1999, 19:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:9673] Re: Limitations, Jim Devine Tue 27 Jul 1999, 22:41 GMT