PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:9573] RE: Rummel et al
>>>
>>> Max Sawicky <sawicky@xxxxxxxxxx> 07/22/99 06:11PM >>>Now am I losing my mind, or does the phrase
"That doesn't mean the term is inappropriate . . . "
where the antecedent for 'the term' is 'genocide'
not mean that I am allowing, in my wishy-washy way,
that the term COULD be appropriate?
(((((((((((
Charles: Thanks so much for "allowing" this , oh ,great wishy washy, grand pooh bah. (What was the rest of stuff mocking Lin Bao's phraesology ? ) .
Wishy-washy paternalism is a characteristic of 20th Century liberalism.
Charles Brown
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:9577] Re: tiresome debates,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 17:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:9576] Re: the Max Questions,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 17:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:9575] A Simple Solemn Farewell,
Frank Durgin Fri 23 Jul 1999, 16:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:9574] Re: tiresome debates,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 16:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:9573] RE: Rummel et al,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 16:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:9571] RE: Rummel et al,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 15:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:9568] Sandronsky's Off-List equest,
Seth Sandronsky Fri 23 Jul 1999, 15:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:9567] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Fri 23 Jul 1999, 14:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:9566] Re: Credibility:Max's demogogy continue.,
Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 14:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]