BLS DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JULY 22, 1999 Both the number of events and the number of workers affected by extended mass layoffs increased in the first quarter of 1999 compared with the same period a year earlier, according to BLS. In the January to March period of this year, BLS said there were 1,484 mass layoff actions by employers that resulted in job losses for a total of 267,214 workers. Somewhat more than half of the employers (57 percent) reporting mass layoffs said they expected to recall these employees. The figures for the most recent period were higher than the 1,320 mass layoff events recorded for the first quarter of 1998, which resulted in job losses for a total of 208,082 workers. .... (Daily Labor Report, page D-5) An article titled "Why Job Losses Are Rising Amid Job Hunters' Nirvana" discusses how surveys can simultaneously show rising layoffs and an unemployment rate that hovers near a 30-year low. BLS statistics are quoted. ... Though layoffs tend to attract more attention during periods of economic stress, they can often signal economic vitality and long-term willingness to create jobs, even as they temporarily victimize some workers. .... The announced layoffs data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas need to be put into the context of a labor market that is constantly churning. Another, truly startling, number is: 13 million workers change their employment status in a typical month, according to BLS. On average, that means 13 million Americans leave home or school to enter the labor force, exit the labor force without looking for new work, find new work after a spell of unemployment, or search for work after they quit or are dismissed or laid off -- every month. ... The Labor Department does collect data every two years on dislocated workers -- workers who lose their jobs because a plant closes or moves, or because sales fall. ... These figures have been falling as have the number of unemployed workers who report they lost their jobs. ... (Michael M. Weinstein in New York Times, page C1, www.nytimes.com/99/07/22/news/financial) A correction was carried by Business Week (July 26, page 11). An earlier article had "erroneously asserted" that the CPI does not allow for substitution of one good for another in the same category. Business Week points out that, in January 1999, the CPI was modified to capture such substitutions. Construction of new homes and apartments slumped 5.6 percent in June, dragged down by rising mortgage interest rates, the Commerce Department reports. Seasonally adjusted data compiled by the department's Census Bureau showed that housing starts dropped back to a 1.57 million a year rate in June. That was the slowest pace of construction since May 1998, when builders broke ground on new homes and apartments at a 1.54 million a year pace. Plunging construction in the West and Midwest more than offset a slight rise in starts in the South, and falling single-family home construction outstripped the growth in multifamily starts. ... (Daily Labor Report, page D-1; Wall Street Journal, page A2)
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- [PEN-L:9574] Re: tiresome debates, Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 16:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:9573] RE: Rummel et al, Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 16:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:9571] RE: Rummel et al, Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 15:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:9568] Sandronsky's Off-List equest, Seth Sandronsky Fri 23 Jul 1999, 15:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:9567] BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 23 Jul 1999, 14:25 GMT
- [PEN-L:9566] Re: Credibility:Max's demogogy continue., Charles Brown Fri 23 Jul 1999, 14:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:9558] Indonesia: More Massacres?, Sam Pawlett Fri 23 Jul 1999, 02:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:9556] The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tues, 20 July 99 -- 3:56 (#297), Paul Kneisel Fri 23 Jul 1999, 02:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:9554] New World Order, Rod Hay Fri 23 Jul 1999, 01:15 GMT