[PEN-L:8743] Re: RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:8743] Re: RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?
From: Brad De Long <delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:30:25 -0700

>
>Lange's praise of Hayek has been misstated here.  The point of
>his exercise is not simulate a "free market," but a market where
>all 'externalities' are correctly priced, and where the distribution
>of income is "fair."  This is hard to do.
>
>mbs


And the really existing market does not do it...


Brad DeLong

References:
- [PEN-L:8704] RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?
  - From: Max B. Sawicky

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:8742] Woman as the Other of Philosophy (was (Fwd) Review of *Hegel and Marx....)
Next by Date: [PEN-L:8744] The perils of privatization
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:8704] RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?
Next by thread: [PEN-L:8686] RE: Serb dictatorship?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:8686] RE: Serb dictatorship?, Max B. Sawicky Thu 01 Jul 1999, 10:59 GMT
  - [PEN-L:8689] Serb dictatorship?, Louis Proyect Thu 01 Jul 1999, 12:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:8685] RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Tom Walker Thu 01 Jul 1999, 05:16 GMT
  - [PEN-L:8704] RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Max B. Sawicky Thu 01 Jul 1999, 15:16 GMT
    - [PEN-L:8743] Re: RE: RE: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Brad De Long Thu 01 Jul 1999, 23:30 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]