Rod Hay wrote:
One can interpret the Arrow-Debreu model as the ultimate undermining of neoclassical general equilibrium. By showing the conditions that are required to reach an equilibrium, they demonstrate that it is extremely unlikely to occur in any actual economy. (The necessity for perfect and complete futures markets has been pointed out).
But most neoclassicals respond to this by saying that the world is close enough to the theory, and that where the real world differs from theory, the real world should be changed to match the dictates of theory. So you've got Shiller seriously talking about futures markets in everything.
Doug
- [PEN-L:8372] [fla-left] [affirmative action] Ballot fight predicted (fwd), Michael Hoover Sun 27 Jun 1999, 00:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:8371] [fla-left] AMNESTY-FL: AI Report on Florida Jail Conditions (fwd), Michael Hoover Sun 27 Jun 1999, 00:48 GMT
- [PEN-L:8365] Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Rod Hay Sat 26 Jun 1999, 18:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:8366] Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Doug Henwood Sat 26 Jun 1999, 18:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:8369] Re: Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Jim Devine Sun 27 Jun 1999, 00:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:8373] Re: Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Ken Hanly Sun 27 Jun 1999, 01:45 GMT
- Re: [PEN-L:8373] Re: Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, John M. Legge Sun 27 Jun 1999, 02:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:8361] minimum wage and ceo pay, June Zaccone Sat 26 Jun 1999, 14:26 GMT