[PEN-L:8360] Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:8360] Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?
From: Brad De Long <delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:46:51 -0700

>>Neoclassical economists confuse the issues.
>
>No we don't--at least those of us in the
>Samuelson-Arrow-Sen-Stiglitz-Summers tradition don't.

Are Bill Clinton and Thomas Friedman in the
Samuelson-Arrow-Sen-Stiglitz-Summers tradition? I would guess so...

Louis Proyect

I don't. Neither Bill Clinton nor Thomas Friedman is a neoclassical
economist. Each of them thinks in a very different manner than we
neoclassical economists do...


Brad DeLong

Follow-Ups:
- [PEN-L:8363] Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?
  - From: Jim Devine

References:
- [PEN-L:8295] Re: Bengali famine
  - From: Rod Hay
- [PEN-L:8316] Bengali famine
  - From: Louis Proyect

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:8359] Re: Re: Re: Re: California Green Party Assembly Representive
Next by Date: [PEN-L:8361] minimum wage and ceo pay
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:8316] Bengali famine
Next by thread: [PEN-L:8363] Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:8295] Re: Bengali famine, Rod Hay Thu 24 Jun 1999, 19:45 GMT
  - [PEN-L:8304] Re: Re: Bengali famine, Brad De Long Thu 24 Jun 1999, 22:21 GMT
    - [PEN-L:8313] Bengali famine, Louis Proyect Thu 24 Jun 1999, 23:44 GMT
    - [PEN-L:8316] Bengali famine, Louis Proyect Fri 25 Jun 1999, 00:38 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:8360] Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Brad De Long Sat 26 Jun 1999, 12:29 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:8363] Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Jim Devine Sat 26 Jun 1999, 15:21 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:8364] Will Nato intervene in Bangladesh next?, Louis Proyect Sat 26 Jun 1999, 16:33 GMT
      
      [PEN-L:8368] Re: Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?, Peter Dorman Sat 26 Jun 1999, 23:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:8291] Re: Bengali famine, DOUG ORR Thu 24 Jun 1999, 18:16 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]