PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:8246] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: California Green Party Assembly Representive requests help
Yes, but what WILL they fund? More lanes.
Gene Coyle
Brad De Long wrote:
> >Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
> >
> >> <snip>
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> If memory serves there was group in SF Bay area advocating "planned
> >> congestion" and "market" (i.e. price) approach (increasing bridge tolls and
> >> parking fees) to make cars less attractive for commuters - a very clever
> >> way of using market ideology to fight the auto industry.
> >>
> >> wojtek
> >
> > There are two groups in the Bay Area pushing congestion pricing. I don't
> >think it is that clever. the groups are the Environmental Defense Fund and
> >the Union of Concerned Scientists -- Berkeley office. If we rely on
> >congestion pricing, who is it that is going to drive? And what do the rest
> >do, without transit?
> >
> >Gene Coyle
>
> The congestion pricing fees *are* there to fund mass transit (or anything
> else you want). Maybe you would be happier if you thought of it as a
> progressive tax on a polluting activity...
>
> Brad DeLong
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:8182] Re: Re: Re: Re: California Green Party AssemblyRepresentiverequests help, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]