PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:8215] Re: Re: Re: Re: California Green Party Assembly Representive requests help
>Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> If memory serves there was group in SF Bay area advocating "planned
>> congestion" and "market" (i.e. price) approach (increasing bridge tolls and
>> parking fees) to make cars less attractive for commuters - a very clever
>> way of using market ideology to fight the auto industry.
>>
>> wojtek
>
> There are two groups in the Bay Area pushing congestion pricing. I don't
>think it is that clever. the groups are the Environmental Defense Fund and
>the Union of Concerned Scientists -- Berkeley office. If we rely on
>congestion pricing, who is it that is going to drive? And what do the rest
>do, without transit?
>
>Gene Coyle
The congestion pricing fees *are* there to fund mass transit (or anything
else you want). Maybe you would be happier if you thought of it as a
progressive tax on a polluting activity...
Brad DeLong
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:8177] Re: Re: Re: California Green Party Assembly Representiverequests help, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]