PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:7682] Re: Leninism
> On point (1) - we're a long way from the Hilferdingesque world that Lenin
> wrote and thought about. Competition has intensified, finance and industry
> haven't joined into a single unit (bank-supervised cartels), etc. So while
> 1917 was different from 1817, 1999 is pretty different from 1917, too. On
> point
My only point here is that Lenin made a substantial contribution to
the Marxian theory of capitalist stages, not that we are currently
confronting the same stage which confronted Lenin.
(2) - I think Soviet history confirmed that changing the folks at the
> helm is not without its problems, and that there was substantial continuity
> between Tsarist and Soviet Russia. If anything, that's an argument against
> Leninism's relevance today.
Again my point was that Lenin made a substantial theoretical
contribution to the Marxist theory of the state.
And (3), well, any nominees for the vanugard
> party today? The Spartacist League? Again, I think you've got to confront
> the fact that organizations and strategies appropriate for a Tsarist police
> state don't have much relevance to an OECD country today.
I might well call for nominees for a serious mass socialist party of
the people. The SP? DSA? Obviously conditions are not right for
either a vanguard or a mass socialist party today.
I don't call myself a Leninist because Marxism-Leninism was
essentially a dogmatic ossification of Marxism promoted by Stalin
with if not evil then unscientific intent and Leninism doesn't
supercede Marxism unmodified.
Nevertheless, if one accepts a stage theory of capitalism, a
structural theory of the bourgeois state, and the likelihood that at
some stage in the revolutionary transition to socialism a vanguard
party will be needed, then one would be justified in calling oneself
a Leninist. Such a person would be no more worthy of dismissal as
irrelevant than any of the rest of us.
Anti sectarians should be extra careful not to dismiss others in a/n
(anti)sectarian fashion [to use pomo parentheticals]. After all,
things turn into their opposites :] (Mao reading Marx reading Hegel).
Terry McDonough
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]