PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:7441] Re: Footnote on LBO
Carrol Cox wrote:
>Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>> Carrol Cox took exception to my "compliment" Doug Henwood:
>> >"I appreciate his excellent efforts through LBO at pressuring the US
>> government
>> >and business interests into fair play."
>>
>> Carrol, I was being patronizing and dismissive. Don't you think I know
>> that?
>
>As I said in the original post, I need a week or two to mull over my basic
>response to this complex of quarrels. The remark quoted above was
>a quick response. But, yes, I knew you were being "patronizing and
>dismissive," and I expected you to know that I knew.
I was as surprised to learn that what I've been doing with LBO for the last
13 years is lobbying the U.S. government and business interests for reforms
in the Henry George/Robert LaFolette tradition as I was last year when I
learned from the same source that Wall Street is a Keynesian tract. How
lucky I am to have a reader who understands me far better than I understand
myself.
Doug
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:7443] PEN-L:5412] Rambouillet Agreement,
Frank Durgin Sat 29 May 1999, 16:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:7442] Suriname,
rc-am Sat 29 May 1999, 16:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:7439] Re: Footnote on LBO,
Carrol Cox Sat 29 May 1999, 15:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:7437] Re: Re:...MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY,
rc-am Sat 29 May 1999, 05:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:7434] Re: Re: Re: Liquidated damages for slavery,
Rod Hay Sat 29 May 1999, 01:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:7433] Re: Extremely important article in China's Peoples's Daily (fwd),
Henry C.K. Liu Sat 29 May 1999, 01:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]