PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6850] Re: The limits of Chinese "anti-imperialism" (fwd)
Stephen:
You are correct to be concerned, but at least the debate has been revived and
the outcome may be a reduction of dependence on foreign trade and investment.
Shanghai, like New York, does not represent all of China.
Henry C.K. Liu
Stephen E Philion wrote:
> Recall what I said last week about the often confused discourse of
> anti-imperialism and neo-liberal ideology taking plaace in China at the
> moment...
>
> Steve
> >
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6847] Nonsense on Stilts,
Michael Perelman Sat 15 May 1999, 02:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:6846] The limits of Chinese "anti-imperialism" (fwd),
Stephen E Philion Sat 15 May 1999, 02:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:6840] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gregor Gysi letter to Slobodan Milosevic,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 14 May 1999, 19:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:6839] Re: Gregor Gysi letter to Slobodan Milosevic,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 14 May 1999, 19:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:6838] Re: Re: Gregor Gysi letter to Slobodan Milosevic,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 14 May 1999, 19:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:6837] Re: Gregor Gysi letter to Slobodan Milosevic,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 14 May 1999, 19:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]