PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6599] Re: Re: Re: china vs. nato
Your Russian wife ought to know.
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote:
> Henry,
> My Russian wife believes that it was an
> intelligence coup by the Yugoslavs, that they
> have an agent in the CIA who fed the error to
> the mapmakers to get the Chinese angry at
> the US (which obviously has happened).
> Actually I think that is more likely than
> the idea that there is a secret anti-Chinese group
> that consciously did it to just out to stir things up
> or that the administration did it to "punish China"
> for nuclear spying. This is clearly a major embarrassment.
> It still looks like the leading candidate is just
> plain incompetence. After all, there have been what,
> 7000+ bombing sorties by now? (or is it 15,000?)
> I don't think that they are being all that careful to double check
> the coordinates on all of those, despite the reported "layers
> of review." The whole bombing campaign stinks and
> everybody knows that there is going to be "collateral
> damage," a euphemism for something that is unacceptable.
> But how to save the perpetrators' faces so that they stop?
> Barkley Rosser
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry C.K. Liu <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 11:18 AM
> Subject: [PEN-L:6579] Re: china vs. nato
>
> >It may not be that simple. I suggest that just like Watergate, or the
> >Zimmermann telegram over Mexico, the origin of the "mistake" was very
> >complex, having to do with forces within the US government wanting to
> >torpedo Clinton's China policy. It is credible that the White
> >House/National Security Council/State Department/Pentagon were all
> >officially "innocent" albeit incompetent. But the whole affair smelled
> >like domestic political terrorism at work, using China as a conduit,
> >aiming at several birds with one stone: US/China relations, stalling peace
> >processes in Kosovo until after the next US election, pushing China/Russia
> >alliance to reinforce the need for NATO, etc., etc.
> >And it has succeeded spectacularly.
> >The global geo-political landscape is as much in ruins as the town is
> >Kosovo.
> >
> >Henry C.K. Liu
> >
> >Michael Perelman wrote:
> >
> >> It seems that China is angry because the highly touted CIA cannot read
> >> street maps, which clearly show the Chinese embassy, while the US is
> >> angry because China has been able to discover top secret information.
> >> Does anybody else find this imbalance curious?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Michael Perelman
> >> Economics Department
> >> California State University
> >> Chico, CA 95929
> >>
> >> Tel. 530-898-5321
> >> E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6596] Re: on econometrics,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Mon 10 May 1999, 19:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:6595] Re: How he could hit the embassy,
Charles Brown Mon 10 May 1999, 19:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:6594] Re: Re: china vs. nato,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Mon 10 May 1999, 19:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:6593] Re: on econometrics,
Charles Brown Mon 10 May 1999, 18:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:6592] RE: on econometrics,
Fellows, Jeffrey Mon 10 May 1999, 18:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:6598] Re: on econometrics,
Tom Walker Mon 10 May 1999, 18:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]