[PEN-L:6576] china vs. nato

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PEN-L:6576] china vs. nato
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 07:31:58 -0700

It seems that China is angry because the highly touted CIA cannot read
street maps, which clearly show the Chinese embassy, while the US is
angry because China has been able to discover top secret information.
Does anybody else find this imbalance curious?

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- [PEN-L:6579] Re: china vs. nato
  - From: Henry C.K. Liu
- [PEN-L:6577] china vs. nato
  - From: Louis Proyect

Prev by Date: [PEN-L:6577] china vs. nato
Next by Date: [PEN-L:6578] Fwd: RE: Was it a mistake?
Previous by thread: [PEN-L:6574] Legal Investigations of allegations on Kosovo
Next by thread: [PEN-L:6577] china vs. nato
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6582] [Fwd: Interesting Econometrics Topics?], Tom Lehman Mon 10 May 1999, 15:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:6583] Progressive Response: NATO, Korea, Kosovo, Interhemispheric Resource Center Mon 10 May 1999, 15:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:6578] Fwd: RE: Was it a mistake?, Robert Naiman Mon 10 May 1999, 14:53 GMT
  - [PEN-L:6581] Re: Fwd: RE: Was it a mistake?, Michael Eisenscher Mon 10 May 1999, 15:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:6576] china vs. nato, Michael Perelman Mon 10 May 1999, 14:31 GMT
  - [PEN-L:6577] china vs. nato, Louis Proyect Mon 10 May 1999, 14:31 GMT
  - [PEN-L:6579] Re: china vs. nato, Henry C.K. Liu Mon 10 May 1999, 15:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:6574] Legal Investigations of allegations on Kosovo, Charles Brown Mon 10 May 1999, 14:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:6573] Fwd: Re: Re: Hahnel read du, Rod Hay Mon 10 May 1999, 14:12 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]