PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6100] Re: A note of thanks to all
On Wednesday, April 28, 1999 at 08:30:20 (-0700) Michael Perelman writes:
>...
>Although I vehemently disagree with St. Max's read on the war, I think
>that the tone of the dialogue with him is admirable. Nobody has lost
>their sense of humor in dealing with our fallen colleague, and he has
>responded in kind.
I'm not sure I can call my tone admirable, though I am trying my best
not to be mean-spirited. I really do think Max has shown admirable
patience. We are very lucky to have someone to argue with about this,
in more or less civilized tones.
Bill
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6093] Re: The quality and quantity of work,
Tom Walker Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:6096] Re: Thatcher and Blair a Love Affair,
Tom Walker Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:6094] Re: Long Hours....,
Tom Walker Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:6091] A note of thanks to all,
Michael Perelman Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:6090] Oil Embargo and Agriculture.,
Ken Hanly Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:6089] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:6087] [Fwd: WSJ: Clinton May Compromise on SS],
Tom Lehman Wed 28 Apr 1999, 15:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]