PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
More Double Standards
- Subject: More Double Standards
- From: "Anthony D'Costa" <dcosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 14:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
US winks at sanctions, imports from
BARC
By Dinesh C Sharma
The Times of India News Service
MUMBAI: Are US sanctions a one-way street? It would seem
so,
with the US importing high-tech products from some of the
very
institutions which are on its black list. One such
institution is the
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) which hit the US
embargo charts after the nuclear tests last May.
BARC has finalised a deal to supply some critical
components
called ``thorium buttons'' to GE of the US. These are used
in
non-nuclear generators manufactured by the American
electrical
giant. ``The number of buttons is large though the value
may be
small. But what matters is that it is an American order,''
says
BARC director Anil Kakodkar who is also a member of the
Atomic Energy Commission.
In fact, embargo is not a such a dreaded word in BARC.
Living
with embargoes is a way of life for BARC and other
establishments of the Department of Atomic Energy. ``We
have
lived with sanctions since 1974. We developed pressurised
heavy
water reactors, fast breeder reactors and the Kamini, all
despite
sanctions. We are not vulnerable to external embargoes. If
a
supplier refuses to supply, we say thank you,'' points out
Mr
Kalkodkar.
When an equipment or component is denied, scientists work
overtime to develop it in India. For example, the furnace
for the
Nuclear Fuel Complex in Hyderabad. The US supplied the
hardware but denied the software. BARC developed the
software
within a few months. ``Sometimes this process may be time
consuming. But this is the only way to do it. Self-reliance
is your
immunity against technology denials,'' feels DAE chairman R
Chidambaram. In many cases, the embargo vanishes as soon as
we develop the systems, said a DAE official.
Oddly, even safety related equipment comes under embargoes.
Mr
Chidambaram says a he has asked members of the Nuclear
Suppliers' Group, an offshoot of the NPT signatories' club,
to lift
the sanctions on these items.
About nuclear deterrence, he says ``we have developed an
adequate scientific database to develop devices which you
need for
a credible nuclear deterrence. We tested a dozen ideas and
systems and all of them were successful. The sub- kiloton
test has
given us the capability to carry out sub-critical tests,
should we
need such tests''.
------------------
Anthony P. D'Costa
Associate Professor
Comparative International Development
University of Washington
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax : (253) 692-5612
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:5629] Clark proposed bombing Russian warships,
Frank Durgin Tue 20 Apr 1999, 19:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:5628] [Fwd: Fwd: Interview with Noam Chomsky],
S Pawlett Tue 20 Apr 1999, 19:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:5626] Re: RE: Re: How the Left repeats simplistic analogies (How the Serbs became fascists,
Charles Brown Tue 20 Apr 1999, 19:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:5623] terror bombing,
Doug Henwood Tue 20 Apr 1999, 18:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:5622] Re: RE: Re: How the Left repeats simplistic analogies (How the Serbs became fascists,
Charles Brown Tue 20 Apr 1999, 18:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:5616] Re: RE: Re: How the Left repeats simplistic analogies (How the Serbs became fascists,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Tue 20 Apr 1999, 17:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]