PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6225] Re: Why Nato needs to destroy Serbia
Wojtek wrote:
>- it is patently false. The current institutional design is based on two
>developments, the institutional designed developed under central planning
>and the interplay of occupational and professional interests under the
>central planning regime (for the primer see Konrad and Szelenyi, _The
>Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power_, New York: Haracourt Brace
>Jovanovich, 1979; and Kennedy, _Professionals, Power and Solidarity in
>Poland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Wojtek,
Do Konrad and Szelenyi say anything about Oskar Lange's contribution to
establishing the economic principles of the central planning regime?
regards,
Tom Walker
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/covenant.htm
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6237] Economic Consequences of Bombing etc.,
Ken Hanly Fri 30 Apr 1999, 17:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:6235] Russia: Down Not Out?,
Seth Sandronsky Fri 30 Apr 1999, 17:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:6232] Another Note---severed heads in the garden,
Tom Lehman Fri 30 Apr 1999, 16:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:6227] from SLATE,
Jim Devine Fri 30 Apr 1999, 15:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:6225] Re: Why Nato needs to destroy Serbia,
Tom Walker Fri 30 Apr 1999, 15:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:6223] Russian trade union leader on war on Yugoslavia,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:6220] Re: peacekeepers and partition,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:6216] Re: Rambouillet "agreement" was a set-up - like Czechoslova,
Ricardo Duchesne Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:6217] Re: Vaclav Havel on NATO's attack,
Ricardo Duchesne Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]