PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6220] Re: peacekeepers and partition
>>> Yoshie Furuhashi <furuhashi.1@xxxxxxx> 04/29/99 05:50PM >>
An army of occupation (whether in
South Korea or the Balkans) basically exists to keep restive workers,
students, and other uppity elements under control, in case they demand even
a tiny degree of real self-determination (through reforms or revolutions).
Your own country's standing army is bad enough, if you are an advocate for
workers' rights, not to mention a socialist; foreign soldiers who may lack
sympathy with natives, I cannot but argue, are likely to be much worse.
(((((((((((((((((((((
Charles: I agree with Yoshie. This is a main basis for the system of capitalism, if not individual companies, specifically identifiable now, insuring profiteering and ripe conditions for exploitation will result from the NATO attack and conquest. The specific newspeak is Conquest = Peacekeeping.
Charles Brown
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6232] Another Note---severed heads in the garden,
Tom Lehman Fri 30 Apr 1999, 16:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:6227] from SLATE,
Jim Devine Fri 30 Apr 1999, 15:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:6225] Re: Why Nato needs to destroy Serbia,
Tom Walker Fri 30 Apr 1999, 15:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:6223] Russian trade union leader on war on Yugoslavia,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:6220] Re: peacekeepers and partition,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:6216] Re: Rambouillet "agreement" was a set-up - like Czechoslova,
Ricardo Duchesne Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:6217] Re: Vaclav Havel on NATO's attack,
Ricardo Duchesne Fri 30 Apr 1999, 14:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]