[PEN-L:4107] Re: RE: LaRouche on Soros

["Charles Brown" <CharlesB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I put a "not" in below where I believe Henry intended one. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post et al. have got to be among the biggest demogogues in history. At least, with LaRouche people are automatically skeptically testing the veracity of his statements. Henry is correct on testing all sources of information with skepticism.

Other evidence (like the whole history of British capitalism and imperialism) gives some corroboration supporting the allegations against the British aristocracy. Only anglophiliac sentimentality would give rise to a presumption of innocence for the British Royal family.

The sun never set on the British Empire because god didn't trust the British in the dark. That's an open secret.

LaRouche seems like a rogue CIA agent. He might have  motive to expose internal secrets on the Company and James Bond's gang too.

Charles Brown

>>> "Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 03/03/99 03:33PM >>>
Max, you should not take any facts for granted from any source.
I can sympathsize with you objection to La Rouche's interpretation of
facts, but you will have to disprove his facts before you can convincing
reject them.
Lets not help promote solidarity in the right.

Henry

Max Sawicky wrote:

> >
> > I was thinking as I started reading this, "Ok, so
> > Executive Intelligence
> > Review is a LaRouche publication. That doesn't mean
> > the info is bad."
>
> Yes it does.
>
> I wouldn't take any fact for granted if it came
> from that source.
>
> mbs