[PEN-L:4100] Re: LaRouche on Soros <36DD795B.10AC624E@mindspring.com> <v04011713b3033ca571cf@[166.84.250.86]>

["Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The extreme right attacking the new right is a delightful sight to behold.
Its about time the left can enjoy seeing the divide and rule strategy
backfiring on the right.
This was written in 1996, and was circulated in the contxt of East European
opposition to free market restructuring and privatization.
Now if Communists said the same thing, it would be dismissed as mere
propaganda.

Why is the British House of Windsor above suspicion.
You obvious have a better opinion of it than most former victims of British
imperialism.  Some Americans also thought LaRouge was insane for calling the
British royalty drug smugglers on a super scale. It is historically accurate -
it led to the Opium Wars.
There are no doubt some lunacies in the articles.  This is not one of them.
Like the free trade issue - just because Buchanan is agianst it, does not make
it good.
It is as pathetic as when after the Japanese occupation during WWII, the
British came back to Hong Kong as liberators to resume colonial rule!

Henry


Doug Henwood wrote:

> Henry C.K. Liu quoted:
>
> >Soros is the visible side of a vast and nasty secret network of
> >private financial interests, controlled by the leading aristocratic and
> >royal families of Europe, centered in the British House of Windsor.
>
> I was thinking as I started reading this, "Ok, so Executive Intelligence
> Review is a LaRouche publication. That doesn't mean the info is bad." Then
> I came across this bit of lunacy.
>
> Doug