PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:3899] Re: elitism
Carrol Cox wrote:
>It is because I put so much emphasis on theoretical reflection that
>I am engaged in my present campaign of everyone on these lists
>who engages in poisoning the wells of discourse by substituting
>empty labels like "elitist" or "pomo" for the description, naming,
>and critique of concrete positions. (To call such procedures
>"generalizations" is as misleading as calling cyanide "merely
>a chemical." True, but the excuse of a scoundrel.)
what's wrong with the term "elitist"? Elitism (unlike, say, PoMoism) has a
clear meaning: the elite is better than the rest, deserves to get a lion's
share of the goodies, deserves to rule, etc.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx &
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/jdevine.html
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:3902] Re: Re: The Vietnam War Era and the Sixties,
Sam Pawlett Fri 26 Feb 1999, 19:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:3901] Jim Craven on "Burn",
Louis Proyect Fri 26 Feb 1999, 19:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:3900] RE: Re: death penalty for racist beast,
Max Sawicky Fri 26 Feb 1999, 19:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:3886] Grassroot competition,
Henry C.K. Liu Fri 26 Feb 1999, 19:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:3899] Re: elitism,
Jim Devine Fri 26 Feb 1999, 18:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:3903] Re: Re: death penalty for racist beast,
sokol Fri 26 Feb 1999, 18:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:3898] Re: Colonial trade,
Colin Danby Fri 26 Feb 1999, 18:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:3884] Strange Bedfellows,
Henry C.K. Liu Fri 26 Feb 1999, 18:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:3897] Re: Re: Re: Re: Papa Doc and the Social Construction ofRace,
Ken Hanly Fri 26 Feb 1999, 18:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]