PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:3398] Re: Canada (Bill)
Bill Burgess wrote,
>OK, "fighting" is a crude term. But how can the 'left' "select, prune,
>train" and especially "harvest" without political power? Or do you have in
>mind some kind of tactical alliance with the most promising capitalist
>plants against the bourgeois weeds and deadwood? The NBER study suggests
>the latter are the family-controlled corporate pyramids, so I guess this
>alliance is exactly opposite to the one you said the left has beein
>pursuing in the last couple of decades with 'rentier' capitalism. Boy, that
>really is swimming against the stream!
I wouldn't suggest for a moment that a different strategy would be easier.
But to continue your metaphor, if the left wants to spawn, it's going to
have to _learn_ to swim against the stream.
regards,
Tom Walker
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:3403] Re: RE: Re: Re: Canada,
Peter Dorman Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:3402] Re: Doug's question II,
valis Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:3401] Origins of "overdetermination", was Re: Psychoanalysis,
Peter Dorman Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:3399] Re: Canada (Doug),
Tom Walker Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:3398] Re: Canada (Bill),
Tom Walker Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:3400] query,
Jim Devine Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:3397] Re: Doug's question <199902150032.TAA05042@sawasdee.cc.columbia.edu> <v04011703b2ed158ea2e4@[166.84.250.86]> <199902142348.SAA02510@merhaba.cc.columbia.edu> <36C746BF.F140BA81@mb.sympatico.ca> <v04011702b2ecb350e423@[166.84.250.86]> <v04011700b2edef2098a5@[166.84.250.86]> <36C84958.3C59ED0@ecst.csuchico.edu>,
Ken Hanly Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:3396] Re: Re: Re: Canada,
Jim Devine Mon 15 Feb 1999, 19:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:3395] Re: Colonial trade,
Ricardo Duchesne Mon 15 Feb 1999, 18:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]