PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2930] Re: selling Manhattan
At 10:44 AM 2/5/99 -0800, Michael wrote:
>Barkley know[s] better. The Dutch did not BUY Manhattan since the indigenous
>people had no conception [of] private proerty. They gave beads and the
people
>let them stay there and use the land. Only later did they declare it to
>be private property.
also, didn't the Dutch have military superiority at the time, so as to make
sure that they got a good deal and that they could interpret the deal the
way they wanted?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx &
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/jdevine.html
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2934] Re: New Economist Petition: Pay Off the Public Debt,
Brad De Long Fri 05 Feb 1999, 20:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:2935] AGF's World economy 1400-1800,
Ricardo Duchesne Fri 05 Feb 1999, 20:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:2936] Re: Re: Bounced from Anwar Shaikh,
Jim Devine Fri 05 Feb 1999, 20:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:2932] Re: Re: Long waves,
Jim Devine Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:2930] Re: selling Manhattan,
Jim Devine Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:2929] New Economists' Petition,
Max Sawicky Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:2925] Re: Bounced from Anwar Shaikh,
Tom Walker Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:2928] Re: Long waves,
Louis Proyect Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2926] Re: Re: selling Manhattan John Barkley" at Feb 5, 99 01:38:30 pm <v04011720b2e0ed666597@[166.84.250.86]>,
Michael Perelman Fri 05 Feb 1999, 19:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]