PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2730] Re: 2 questions
On Sat, January 30, 1999 at 19:05:13 (-0800) Michael Perelman writes:
>I was just reading an article by Robert Gordon about the low total
>factor productivity growth during the late 19th C. I know that this was
>a period of rapid technical change. I suspect that the low productivity
>growth was an artifact reflecting the highly competitive conditions at
>the time.
>
>1. Does anybody know of any work in considering the effect of
>competitive conditions on measured productivity?
I don't know if this is precisely what you want, but if you haven't
seen it, you might try William Lazonick's work, particularly:
William Lazonick, *Business Organization and the Myth of the Market
Economy* (Cambridge University Press, 1991)
William Lazonick, *Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor* (Harvard
University Press, 1990)
Bill
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2737] Re: Re: international political economy books, (continued)
- [PEN-L:2733] Out of print?,
Tom Walker Sun 31 Jan 1999, 17:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:2732] Duty vs. Bargain,
Tom Walker Sun 31 Jan 1999, 06:14 GMT
- [PEN-L:2731] Re: Re: 2 questions,
Michael Perelman Sun 31 Jan 1999, 04:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2730] Re: 2 questions,
William S. Lear Sun 31 Jan 1999, 04:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:2729] Re: 2 questions,
Doug Henwood Sun 31 Jan 1999, 04:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:2728] 2 questions,
Michael Perelman Sun 31 Jan 1999, 03:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:2727] international political economy books,
ECUSERS Sun 31 Jan 1999, 01:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:2726] Re: book on global economic institutions,
Mathew Forstater Sat 30 Jan 1999, 22:58 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]