PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2689] Long Term Capital
I wonder if we could provoke Doug Henwood's reaction to the article on
LTCM in last Sunday's New York Times Magazine. It struck me as an
apologetic: Michael Lewis went to Greenwich, listened to LTCM's side of
the story, and wrote it up. The only thing wrong with their models,
they say, is that they didn't take account of the nasty, predatory
behavior of their competitors.
Peter Dorman
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2693] Re: [Fwd: Re: Shleifer and Incentives],
Jim Devine Thu 28 Jan 1999, 21:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:2692] RE: Re: Long Term Capital,
Max Sawicky Thu 28 Jan 1999, 21:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:2691] Re: Long Term Capital,
Doug Henwood Thu 28 Jan 1999, 20:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:2690] Re: Re: Re: LBO intern needed,
Doug Henwood Thu 28 Jan 1999, 20:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:2689] Long Term Capital,
Peter Dorman Thu 28 Jan 1999, 20:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:2688] Re: Re: Re: LBO intern needed,
Stephen E Philion Thu 28 Jan 1999, 19:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:2687] Re: Re: LBO intern needed,
Josh Mason Thu 28 Jan 1999, 19:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:2686] [Fwd: Re: Shleifer and Incentives] boundary="------------C1476A6CA1A75A6E2C650234",
Peter Dorman Thu 28 Jan 1999, 18:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:2685] Re: Duke University's literature department,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Thu 28 Jan 1999, 18:13 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]