PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2608] Re: Immutability of Subjects
>
>> Which group of idiots assumes "subjects are immutable"? Why does
>> anybody pay any attention to them?
>
>Most economists do, with their neoclassical models and schemes of
>rationality...
>
>-- Dennis
Economics is hard enough to do without thinking about the mutability of the
subject too. (Gary Becker and company have been trying to think about the
economics of addiction; and George Constantinides has been trying to think
about investors' extraordinary aversion to stock market risk as a result of
the fact that being rich *changes* you, so that you can no longer be happy
if stock market losses forced you back into middle-class consumption
patterns. I think both have been spinning their wheels.)
We are happy enough to hand over the mutability of the subject to the
sociologists, and have been waiting for them to report back for a long
time...
Brad DeLong
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2611] Re: Re: Immutability of Subjects,
Doug Henwood Tue 26 Jan 1999, 16:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:2612] Re: Re: Immutability of Subjects,
Jim Devine Tue 26 Jan 1999, 16:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:2610] Re: Trade deficit and Doug Henwood,
William S. Lear Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:2609] Trade deficit and Doug Henwood,
Michael Perelman Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:2608] Re: Immutability of Subjects,
Brad De Long Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:2628] Appeal for Help,
James Michael Craven Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2607] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:17 GMT
- [PEN-L:2605] Re: Dark musings from the Rob of Oz,
valis Tue 26 Jan 1999, 15:02 GMT
- [PEN-L:2604] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Tue 26 Jan 1999, 14:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]