PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2564] Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus"
>Brad DeLong wrote,
>>
>>Samuelson and Nordhaus's "lump of labor" fallacy is the Classical doctrine
>>that fiscal and monetary policy cannot affect the total amount of
>>employment--that the number of hours worked is fixed, unchangeable,
>>unresponsive to government policies.
>
>Ah, now we're getting somewhere. Wouldn't that Classical doctrine be what is
>known as the wages-fund doctrine, Brad?
>
>
>
>Tom Walker
Yep. But it remains alive, a standard move in the rhetoric of reaction to
use against demands that the government do something to make the economy
behave better...
Brad Delong
Professor J. Bradford De Long
Department of Economics, #3880
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-3880
(510) 643-4027; (925) 283-2709 voice
(510) 642-6615; (925) 283-3897 fax
http://econ161.berkeley.edu/
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2600] Re: "Church-State-Corporate Triangle" series (,
James Michael Craven Mon 25 Jan 1999, 18:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:2583] Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Brad De Long Mon 25 Jan 1999, 18:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:2565] High Court Defeats Pension Lawsuit boundary="------------896880991C9977192EE4F83A",
Tom Lehman Mon 25 Jan 1999, 17:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:2562] Re: Re: Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Peter Dorman Mon 25 Jan 1999, 17:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:2564] Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Brad De Long Mon 25 Jan 1999, 17:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:2563] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Brad De Long Mon 25 Jan 1999, 17:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:2560] RE: Ishmael Reed launches online magazine,
Max Sawicky Mon 25 Jan 1999, 17:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:2559] Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
William S. Lear Mon 25 Jan 1999, 16:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:2558] new frotiers for the Market!,
Jim Devine Mon 25 Jan 1999, 16:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]