PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2530] Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus"
>>Explaining why, N. Gregory Mankiw, a 40-year-old Harvard economist and
>>author of a popular new textbook, "Principles of Economics," said: "We make
>>a distinction now between positive or descriptive statements that are
>>scientifically verifiable and normative statements that reflect values and
>>judgments. The question is, can you do positive economics without normative
>>economics. I think so."
>
>This is a lie. Economists *disguise* value judgements as descriptive
>statements and then mine the data to "verify" their position.
>
An example? Preferably one from the work of N. Gregory Mankiw?
Brad DeLong
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2534] Re: Butler and bad writing,
Tom Walker Mon 25 Jan 1999, 01:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:2533] article in lingua franca,
Michael Yates Mon 25 Jan 1999, 01:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:2532] Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Louis Proyect Mon 25 Jan 1999, 00:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:2531] Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Colin Danby Mon 25 Jan 1999, 00:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:2530] Re: Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Brad De Long Sun 24 Jan 1999, 23:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:2529] Butler and bad writing,
MLAFFEY Sun 24 Jan 1999, 23:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2528] Re: Economic's "narrow focus",
Tom Walker Sun 24 Jan 1999, 22:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:2527] miscellany [was: 1998 Bad Writing Contest winners],
Jim Devine Sun 24 Jan 1999, 22:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:2526] Re: Re: Papal potatoes,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Sun 24 Jan 1999, 22:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]