PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2489] Re: Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest
Colin Danby wrote:
>Anyone who has taken the trouble to read _Capital_
>finds that it takes time and work because Marx had to
>develop a new set of concepts and a new language to
>describe them with. As Doug notes, we accept that
>Kant and Hegel also wrote in difficult ways, and
>needed to. We accept that it takes time, work, study
>to understand them. Yet that right to be difficult,
>the right to write complex and innovative *theory,* is
>suddenly withdrawn for Judith Butler.
....whose first book, it should be noted, was on Hegel. So she's got an excuse!
Doug
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2493] Re: Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Michael Yates Sat 23 Jan 1999, 02:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:2492] Cecil Rhodes,
Michael Yates Sat 23 Jan 1999, 02:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:2491] Bad Writing Contest boundary="part0_917056821_boundary",
Nativejmc Sat 23 Jan 1999, 02:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:2490] Re: Re: Papal potatoes,
Ken Hanly Sat 23 Jan 1999, 01:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:2489] Re: Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Doug Henwood Sat 23 Jan 1999, 01:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:2488] Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Colin Danby Sat 23 Jan 1999, 00:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:2487] Re: Samuelson lump-of-labor, 1998,
Jim Devine Sat 23 Jan 1999, 00:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:2486] Samuelson lump-of-labor, 1998,
Tom Walker Fri 22 Jan 1999, 23:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2485] Schloss Lump of Labour, 1891,
Tom Walker Fri 22 Jan 1999, 23:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]