PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:2488] Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest
Professor Dannin:
> ... In my opinion, anyone who writes this sort of prose cannot call
themselves
> revolutionaries, and I have real trouble with their calling themselves
> Marxists. They write not for workers but for other privileged
academics, ...
Read a page or two from any of the more theoretical
chapters of _Capital_, with its highly abstract terms
and sprinklings of Latin, and ask yourself what
audience its author had in mind.
Anyone who has taken the trouble to read _Capital_
finds that it takes time and work because Marx had to
develop a new set of concepts and a new language to
describe them with. As Doug notes, we accept that
Kant and Hegel also wrote in difficult ways, and
needed to. We accept that it takes time, work, study
to understand them. Yet that right to be difficult,
the right to write complex and innovative *theory,* is
suddenly withdrawn for Judith Butler.
Best, Colin
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:2492] Cecil Rhodes,
Michael Yates Sat 23 Jan 1999, 02:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:2491] Bad Writing Contest boundary="part0_917056821_boundary",
Nativejmc Sat 23 Jan 1999, 02:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:2490] Re: Re: Papal potatoes,
Ken Hanly Sat 23 Jan 1999, 01:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:2489] Re: Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Doug Henwood Sat 23 Jan 1999, 01:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:2488] Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest,
Colin Danby Sat 23 Jan 1999, 00:50 GMT
- [PEN-L:2487] Re: Samuelson lump-of-labor, 1998,
Jim Devine Sat 23 Jan 1999, 00:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:2486] Samuelson lump-of-labor, 1998,
Tom Walker Fri 22 Jan 1999, 23:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2485] Schloss Lump of Labour, 1891,
Tom Walker Fri 22 Jan 1999, 23:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:2483] Re: Re: Re: 1998 Bad Writing Contest winners,
Jim Devine Fri 22 Jan 1999, 22:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]