PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:1905] Re: SAVE OUR PLANET. STATUS
Dear Ish,
Only recently have I become aware of the seriousness and
the possible revolutionary potential the Y2K poses.
Without a lot of research I find it very difficult to evaluate
whether the pros or contras will prevail. The decentralization
effect seems rather certain. But will this necessarily weaken
the TNCs ? They have time and resources to prepare for the
new situation. They will have to strengthen their planning and
make it longer sighted. And will it be easier to fight many
local branches in stead of one centralized headquarter ?
The attitude of their politicians probably will not change over-
night.
Compared with the internationalization of the TNCs by means of
the world parliament I would find the task to be much more
complicated.
And the possible breakdown of the Internet not only would be a
catastrophe for the TNCs, but also for US ! Up until now I have
considered the net to be the great chance of our planet.
IF, however, we should be so lucky that the Y2K really will be
able
to defeat the TNCs without much effort from our side, I think we
will need the world parliament of the united peoples anyway, to
organize the future globalization on OUR terms and to prevent
Mafia conditions a la Russia.
Regards,
Ole
P.S. This time I think I managed to BCC the many addresses !
Ish skrev:
> Excuse my post to this rather large list, but would like to interject a
> thought for consideration.
>
> An event that looms on the horizon for all of us, no matter where we live,
> is the January 1, 2000 software, embedded chip barrier that the world has
> been preparing to cross. chances are very high international
> communications will be most effected by computer errors and failures.
> Hence, these TNC will be most effected in their efforts to conduct
> business. In essence becoming local branches rather than international in
> nature. It might be a good time to prepare locally for dealing with these
> remnants of the larger corporations..it is when they will be most
> vulnerable to local actions..
> Your thoughts?
> Ishgooda
>
> <<<<=-=-=FREE LEONARD PELTIER=-=-=>>>>
> If you think you are too small to make a difference;
> try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito....
> African Proverb
> <<<<=-=http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/ =-=>>>>
> IF it says:
> "PASS THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW...."
> Please Check it before you send it at:
>
> http://urbanlegends.miningco.com/library/blhoax.htm
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:1909] Daimler and Macdonalds,
Bill Burgess Wed 30 Dec 1998, 08:27 GMT
- [PEN-L:1908] Fwd: Daimler's new culture: How wide? boundary="part0_915001664_boundary",
Nativejmc Wed 30 Dec 1998, 07:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:1907] Fwd: (Fwd) Twas The Night Before Impeachment boundary="part0_914996460_boundary",
Nativejmc Wed 30 Dec 1998, 05:40 GMT
- [PEN-L:1906] RE: holiday greetings,
Bove, Roger E. Wed 30 Dec 1998, 02:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:1905] Re: SAVE OUR PLANET. STATUS,
U.P.secr. Tue 29 Dec 1998, 22:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:1904] DaCh pioneers in SE procedure,
valis Tue 29 Dec 1998, 22:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:1903] Veiled start for the fuel cell?,
valis Tue 29 Dec 1998, 22:27 GMT
- [PEN-L:1902] Daimler's new culture: How wide?,
valis Tue 29 Dec 1998, 22:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:1901] Excuse me, Daimler?,
valis Tue 29 Dec 1998, 22:21 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]