PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:1224] Re: Patriotic economics: a provocation
>What about telling the story that American economics is properly a high wage
>economics and that adherence to a low-wage economics is UNAMERICAN? That is
>to say, for example, that not only is NAIRU questionable as a theory and
>misleading as a guide for policy, it is first and foremost FOREIGN.
>
>The pitfall of such a rhetorical strategy is that it could skirt on
>xenophobia, anti-semitism and a justification of imperialism.
"Skirt on"? Cover itself in like a dog rolling in a raccoon roadkill
carcass, rather...
Brad DeLong
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:1229] Re: pen-lquestions,
James Devine Fri 04 Dec 1998, 16:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:1227] Re: Patriotic economics: a provocation,
Tom Walker Fri 04 Dec 1998, 16:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:1226] FW: THE G7 "SOLUTION" TO THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: A MARSHALL PLAN FOR CREDITORS AND SPECULATORS,
Robert Mac Diarmid Fri 04 Dec 1998, 16:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:1225] Re: Peron said it,
Tom Walker Fri 04 Dec 1998, 15:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:1224] Re: Patriotic economics: a provocation,
Brad De Long Fri 04 Dec 1998, 15:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:1223] New from Chossudovsky,
valis Fri 04 Dec 1998, 15:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:1222] Patriotic economics: a provocation,
Tom Walker Fri 04 Dec 1998, 15:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:1221] Re: Re: Ford and GM's Nazi ties,
William S. Lear Fri 04 Dec 1998, 13:59 GMT
- [PEN-L:1220] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Fri 04 Dec 1998, 13:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]