PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:1206] Re: the quasi-fixed factor fallacy (correction)
>Then the total labour cost with 90 employed workers and 1% unemployed is
That should have read 10 unemployed.
Regards,
Tom Walker
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#408 1035 Pacific St.
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 4G7
knowware@xxxxxxxx
(604) 669-3286
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:1212] Re: Re: pen-l questions n-1,
Jim Devine Fri 04 Dec 1998, 04:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:1211] Re: Re: Ford and GM's Nazi ties,
William S. Lear Fri 04 Dec 1998, 01:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:1210] Re: pen-l questions n-1,
valis Fri 04 Dec 1998, 01:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:1207] Re: toxic sludge isn't good for you, but nitrogenous micro-nutrients are . . .,
michael Fri 04 Dec 1998, 00:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:1206] Re: the quasi-fixed factor fallacy (correction),
Tom Walker Fri 04 Dec 1998, 00:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:1205] Re: pen-l questions,
Michael Perelman Fri 04 Dec 1998, 00:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:1204] the quasi-fixed factor fallacy,
Tom Walker Thu 03 Dec 1998, 23:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:1203] Return on R&D - Cobb-Douglas macro production function,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Thu 03 Dec 1998, 23:26 GMT
- [PEN-L:1202] Re: A Thought II,
valis Thu 03 Dec 1998, 22:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]