PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:435] Re: Re: Re: Re: Cyber-Sawicky
Eugene P. Coyle wrote:
> When an individual goes into a 401 k or similar contrivance, reported
>income for tax purposes goes down. Is the amount deducted "saving"? And
>is that (or any other $$ figure for saving) in a ratio with income for tax
>purposes, or the total income before the 401 k deduction?
Pension plan contributions count as income, so they're counted as personal
savings (defined as income less expenditures).
> Second question: In the national saving rate calculation, is
>corporate "saving" (i. e. depreciation, retained earnings, other free cash
>flow) added in somehow? If not, what would the USA saving rate be if it
>were?
Here you go, from table 5.1 of the NIPAs. The net figure is the result of
subtracting the consumption of fixed capital entries from the gross savings
figures.
U.S. SAVING & INVESTMENT, % OF GDP
gross savings
----------------------------------------
government
------------------ cons of net
total pers corp total fed st/loc fixed K savings
1929 18.5% 3.4% 3.0% 3.7% 1.3% 2.3% 9.2% 9.3%
1930s 12.1% 1.9% -1.4% 1.8% -1.3% 3.1% 11.0% 1.0%
1940s 19.6% 9.5% 2.7% 1.1% -0.8% 1.9% 9.6% 10.0%
1950s 21.1% 5.2% 2.8% 5.3% 3.1% 2.2% 10.5% 10.6%
1960s 21.4% 5.2% 3.6% 5.1% 2.2% 2.9% 10.1% 11.3%
1970s 19.8% 5.8% 2.8% 2.6% -0.5% 3.1% 10.9% 8.9%
1980s 18.0% 5.1% 2.2% 0.8% -2.1% 2.9% 12.0% 6.0%
1990s 16.0% 2.7% 2.9% 1.2% -1.1% 2.5% 11.1% 4.9%
1998 17.5% 12.9% 3.7% 4.7% 2.8% 2.7% 10.7% 6.8%
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:438] BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Thu 08 Oct 1998, 13:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:437] Mainstream economics and the current crisis,
Louis Proyect Thu 08 Oct 1998, 00:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:433] FW: Assessment,
Bove, Roger E. Wed 07 Oct 1998, 23:51 GMT
- [PEN-L:436] Re: Kagarlitsky responds to Hiatt,
Dennis R Redmond Wed 07 Oct 1998, 23:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:435] Re: Re: Re: Re: Cyber-Sawicky,
Doug Henwood Wed 07 Oct 1998, 22:48 GMT
- [PEN-L:434] Re: Kagarlitsky responds....,
valis Wed 07 Oct 1998, 22:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:431] Kagarlitsky responds to Hiatt,
Robert Naiman Wed 07 Oct 1998, 21:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:432] California Economists opposed to Fong Flat Tax?,
Laurence Shute Wed 07 Oct 1998, 19:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:430] Re: Understanding capitalism dialectically,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Wed 07 Oct 1998, 19:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]