PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:359] The prosperous live longer
WSWS : News & Analysis : North America
US Department of Health and Human Services report
The prosperous live longer
By Debra Watson
2 October, 1998
Income inequality has created a substantial gap between the
life expectancy of the poor and that of the better off
according
to a recent US government report. The National Longitudinal
Mortality Study for 1979-1989 showed white men who were 45
years of age during any year from 1979 to 1989, and who had
a family income of at least $25,000, could expect to live
6.6
years longer than those with family incomes less than
$10,000 (33.9 years longer compared with 27.3 years). Black
men lived 6.6 fewer years than white men, but wealthy black
men lived 7.4 years longer than poor black men. Women
lived on average 6 years longer than men.
The cited study makes up part of the health statistics
compiled by US government researchers into a report entitled
Health, United States, 1998. The US Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) sends a report on the health
status of the US population annually to the president and
Congress. It is the first time since such reports were
instituted
that the HHS has reported the effect of income inequality on
the health of the US population.
For the 1998 report, SES (socioeconomic status) was
determined using household income, education level or
occupational status to compile data on a broad range of
health issues. Researchers determined, "Each increase in
social position, measured either by income or education,
improves the likelihood of being in good health. For most of
the health indicators, this SES gradient was observed in
persons in every race and ethnic group examined."
The report adds: "Although progress is occurring toward most
targets, data presented in this chart book demonstrate that,
for many objectives, only the higher socioeconomic groups
have achieved or are close to achieving the target, while
lower
socioeconomic groups lag farther behind."
Social inequality was found to impact on areas such as
infant mortality, death rates, and incidence of poor health.
There were also great differences in the death rate for
different areas of the United States. For example, the death
rate was 15 percent higher than the national average in the
East South Central division, which comprises the acutely
impoverished areas of America's South.
Infant mortality in the US declined between 1983 and 1995.
However, infants born to white mothers with less than 12
years of education were 2.4 times as likely to die in the
first
year of life as those whose mothers had at least 16 years of
education. For minority populations the gap in infant
mortality has widened, in some cases moving away from the
target.
Some environmental risk factors are reported. Children one
to
five years of age living in poor families were over seven
times
as likely to have an elevated blood lead level as children
in
high income families, and one in five poor black children
had
an elevated blood lead level. There are substantially higher
blood lead levels in lower income adults, who are often
exposed to lead in the workplace. Also in 1996, nearly one
in
five Americans still lived in counties that did not meet the
Environmental Protection Agency's standards for
environmental pollutants.
Other risk factors such as smoking, overweight, and
sedentary lifestyle were followed. A passage in the
"Highlights" narrative speculates on the effect wealth has
on
"having knowledge and time to pursue healthy behaviors,
having sufficient income to assure access to comfortable
housing, healthy food, and appropriate health care, access
to
safe and affordable locations to exercise or relax, and
living
and working in a safe, healthy environment." In other words,
the majority of the working population do not have the time,
financial resources or opportunity to pursue a lifestyle
advantageous to better health.
Pronounced inequality exists in access to medical care in
the
US. In 1993, 41 percent of those over 18 and considered low
income had seen a dentist in the previous year compared
with 77 percent of the wealthy. Well-off women over 50 were
70 percent more likely to have had a mammogram in the past
two years than low-income women of the same age group.
The US Census bureau recently released figures showing
that from January 1993 to January 1996 nearly three out of
every ten Americans had no health insurance for at least one
month. Nearly one in six had none for five months or longer,
and half of those people below the poverty level had no
health
insurance for at least one month.
The HHS study also found more people either without
insurance or paying higher premiums and out-of-pocket
costs. The burden of the cuts falls disproportionately on
the
working poor. Between 1989 and 1996 the number of people
with health care insurance in the US dropped from 76
percent to 71 percent. The number of people relying on
Health
Maintenance Organizations to pay for healthcare is steadily
increasing. In 1997 one-quarter of the insured were enrolled
in HMOs, double the 1991 enrollment.
Children living in poverty in 1994-95 were five times more
likely to be without health insurance. And in the states of
Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and
California one in five people had no medical coverage of any
kind.
The entire HHS report can be downloaded as a PDF file
using Adobe Acrobat. Access the web site at
www.cdc.gov/nchswww/products/pubs/pubd/hus/hus.htm
Top of page
Readers: The WSWS invites your comments. Please send
e-mail.
Copyright 1998
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:363] Follow the money (fwd),
michael Sat 03 Oct 1998, 02:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:362] tax breaka and the Wall Street Journal,
michael perelman Sat 03 Oct 1998, 00:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:361] Re: UNION ORGANIZER WANTED: TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
Michael Eisenscher Fri 02 Oct 1998, 23:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:360] Alan Shrugged,
valis Fri 02 Oct 1998, 23:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:359] The prosperous live longer,
Frank Durgin Fri 02 Oct 1998, 22:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:358] Re: Cyber-Sawicky,
Tom Walker Fri 02 Oct 1998, 22:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:357] Louis on cyber-Max and cyber-Dennis,
James Devine Fri 02 Oct 1998, 21:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:356] RE: Re: Cyber-Sawicky,
Max Sawicky Fri 02 Oct 1998, 21:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:355] RE: Re: RE: Re: Cyber-Sawicky,
Max Sawicky Fri 02 Oct 1998, 20:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]