[PEN-L:252] Saving public Clinton

[valis <valis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Gar Lipow rebuts, in part:
> Nonsense, occasional vindictive silliness never hurt anything. I spent
> a great deal of time on another list having to explain why I did
> not want Clinton impeached by the right wing.  ................

I should have Cc'd you in my reply to Jim D (below), thus likely obviating
your elaborate explication, which is certainly superfluous on this list.
The Davos and Hilton Head gangs, among others, anointed this glorified
sideshow con artist to distort perception of their global shell game
and retard any popular American response to its depredations; they would
only be provoked to no good purpose - in terms of the revolution we want -
by seeing Their Boy spear cigarettes and diapers along some highway
in Maryland, or condemned to some other such egalitarian punishment.
As for the outcome you fear from this eruption of sexual McCarthyism:


The First Penis has already won this culture war, anyway, thanks to
the law of unintended consequences.  These GOP crazies are able to focus
on only one (1) obsession at a time, which somehow serves to expose
their scariest profile to public gaze.  Do you know _anyone_ who could
fail to imagine him/herself twisting in Clinton's hot seat after beholding
that inquisitorial tape with the headless prosecutorial voice?
They have a "mirror image" problem: they assume that the average naked ape
on this planet perceives and reacts as they do.  Well, Ken, ciao!

                                                                    valis