PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Labor Day
forwarded by Michael Hoover
> Whose labor day is it really?
>
> by Fred Gaboury
>
> from the September 1.1995 issue of the
> People's Weekly World.
>
> Who founded Labor Day -- and what difference does it make?
>
> Probably not much -- or does it? It's been 113 years since 25,000
> workers from 53 unions marched through New York City's Union Square in
> the nation's first Labor Day parade on September 5, 1882. And it's
> been 101 years since President Grover Cleveland signed legislation
> making Labor Day an official holiday.
>
> Most of us were taught -- to the extent that we were taught anything
> about labor history -- that Peter J. McGuire was the founder of Labor
> Day. But in 1968 the International Association of Machinists (IAM)
> challenged that version of history.
>
> The headline article of the Sept. 5, 1968 Machinist said, "It's time
> to toast the real Maguire," and went on to document the claim that
> Matthew Maguire, a machinist from Paterson, N.J., was the real father
> of Labor Day.
>
> W. Willard Wirtz, then secretary of labor, settled the matter at the
> next IAM convention. "There is no question as to who is the father of
> Labor Day," he told the delegates, " ... so far as the Department of
> Labor is concerned, he is Matt Maquire, the machinist."
>
> But what difference does it make? Isn't it enough that there is a
> Labor Day -- a day that recognizes the contributions of the millions
> of working men and women who create the nation's wealth?
>
> If all that's involved is setting history straight, we could end here.
> But there's more to history than great men and women. There are also
> ideas -- and history is the clash of ideas just as it is the battle
> between classes -- between those who work for a living and those live
> off those who work. And that helps to explain why, for nearly 75
> years, Peter J. McGuire was passed off as the father of Labor Day.
>
> According to Murray Zuckoff, whose research did much to straighten the
> historical record, Maguire was a socialist -- a special kind of
> socialist. As Zuckoff put it, Maguire was "a man deeply imbued with
> the ideas of Marx." In today's world he would probably be a member of
> the Communist Party.
>
> That -- Maguire's deep commitment to socialism as a follower of Karl
> Marx -- was enough to send shivers up the spine of America's ruling
> elite and their supporters in the leadership of the labor movement.
> Thus, as they saw it, the need to find a "founder" for Labor Day:
> someone not "tainted" as an advocate of socialism -- a society based
> on common ownership of the means of producing wealth and distributing
> it, a society where those who create the wealth share equitably in the
> fruits of their labor.
>
> That person was Peter J. McGuire, conservative head of New York's
> Carpenters Union, who once urged "the propriety" of setting aside a
> day for labor at a New York Central Labor Union meeting. After that it
> was easy -- and McGuire stood beside the president as Cleveland made
> it official in 1894.
>
> Only the capitalists -- the class workers call "the Bosses" or "Big
> Business" -- benefit from division in the ranks of workers. Thus the
> development of "divide and rule" -- a tactic the capitalist class here
> has refined to the nth degree.
>
> Part of that tactic is to keep the U.S. working class and its unions
> separated from the world working class movement and from the ideas of
> socialists and Communists. That is why, when the powers that be
> finally acceded to the workers' demands for a national holiday
> recognizing labor, they set it for September while workers in other
> countries celebrate their holiday on May Day.
>
> In this way, American workers were further separated from their
> brothers and sisters in other countries -- a tragedy made even more
> tragic because it was AFL President Samuel Gompers who asked the
> international labor movement, at that time led by associates of Karl
> Marx, to establish an international day of labor solidarity to
> commemorate the May 1, 1886 strike by American workers for an 8-hour
> day!
>
> Another essential of "divide and rule" is to deny people their
> heritage, to convince them that things have always been the way they
> are and that nothing can -- or need -- be done about it.
>
> Another way is to deny or distort the contributions that syndicalists
> like "Big Bill" Haywood, socialists like Eugene V. Debs and Communists
> like William Z. Foster, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and Gus Hall made to
> the struggles of American workers. And, when it comes to Labor Day,
> create and perpetuate the myth that someone -- anybody but a socialist
> -- was the father of Labor Day.
>
> Without the men and women who shared a vision of a just society, where
> no person could profit from the work of another -- without the
> struggles they led and the ideas they fought for -- the American labor
> movement and, for that matter, American society would be much
> different from what it is today.
> _________________________________________________________________
- Thread context:
- Re: Ganja, (continued)
- Re: Ganja,
Rob Schaap Sat 02 May 1998, 05:42 GMT
- Re: Ganja,
MScoleman Sat 02 May 1998, 15:55 GMT
- Re: Ganja,
James Devine Sat 02 May 1998, 15:56 GMT
- Fraser Intitute Media "Penetration" (fwd),
michael Sat 02 May 1998, 02:56 GMT
- Labor Day,
hoov Sat 02 May 1998, 02:00 GMT
- riots?,
Doug Henwood Fri 01 May 1998, 21:02 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: riots?,
jf noonan Fri 01 May 1998, 21:18 GMT
- Re: Update to Shaikh's _Measuring the Wealth of Nations_,
Jay Hecht Fri 01 May 1998, 19:55 GMT
- new list,
Doug Henwood Fri 01 May 1998, 19:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]