BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1998 U.S. manufacturing productivity rose 4.4 percent in 1996, less than in the two previous years but more than the rates recorded in eight of 10 other countries. Only in Japan and Germany did productivity rise faster in 1996 that in the United States, BLS reports ....(Daily Labor Report, page D-7). Personal income rose by 0.6 percent in February, spurred by a sharp increase in wages and salaries, the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis reports ....(Daily Labor Report, page D-1)_____Personal income and spending grew robustly, an indication that consumers will continue to spur economic growth ....(New York Times, March 28, page B2)_____ Americans received an income boost in February, and did what most people would: They spent it ....(Wall Street Journal, page A2). Support staff jobs are on the increase. Traditionally, that term has referred to clerks, receptionists, secretaries, and data entry workers, but that category now includes computer operators, statistical clerks, marketing and advertising assistants, information systems support workers, and financial assistants. And though openings for secretaries - except for medical and legal secretaries - are fewer, the skills are much in demand under the title of administrative assistant. In 1996, there were more than 24 million administrative, clerical, and support staff workers, making up the country's largest major occupational group, says Paul LaPorte of BLS in Chicago. By 2006, there will be nearly 26 million such jobs. LaPorte says jobs for billing and accounting clerks will soar by 41.8 percent; for medical and legal secretaries, 31.7 percent; and for receptionists and information clerks, 29.7 percent .....(Washington Post, March 29, page H15). For every $1 a permanent, full-time worker earns, the average temporary worker gets between 79 and 83 cents, a recent survey from the National Association of Part-Time and Temporary Employees in Kansas reports (Washington Post, March 29, page H15). Equal work with less-equal perks, is the headline for an article in The New York Times (page D1) that says that Microsoft leads the way in filling jobs with "permatemps" ....They hold high-prestige, high-technology jobs at Microsoft's plush campus. They often do the same work as Microsoft's permanent employees ....Yet they do not quality for Microsoft's coveted stock options, and their health and vacation benefits are pale imitations of those enjoyed by regular Microsoft workers ....Microsoft 's temps may feel their contingent status more keenly than other temps, largely because the software giant's well-known policy of giving stock options to employees has made many of the temps' co-workers millionaires, thanks to Microsoft's soaring stock prices .....In 1986, the number of temps employed each day was 800,000, but, according to the National Association of Temporary and Staffing Services, the number soared to 2.5 million last year or about 2 percent of the work force. At least 200,000 of them are long-term temps. By some estimates, temps now represent at least 10 percent of the work force at one-fifth of American corporations. Managers argue that using temps is idea for the modern market's demand for efficiency and flexibility. Many employees say it dovetails with their desire for independence and for stimulating challenges .... The Wall Street Journal's "Tracking the Economy" shows that nonfarm payrolls for March, to be released Friday, are expected to go up 250,000. The unemployment rate for March is expected to remain at 4.6 percent, the same as the February rate.
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Kosovo, (continued)
- Kosovo, PHILLPS Wed 01 Apr 1998, 02:43 GMT
- Pentagon Assessment of Cuban Threat, Thomas Kruse Tue 31 Mar 1998, 02:31 GMT
- Re: Pentagon Assessment of Cuban Threat, Paul Zarembka Tue 31 Mar 1998, 04:33 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 31 Mar 1998, 02:30 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 31 Mar 1998, 02:38 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Tue 31 Mar 1998, 22:29 GMT
- Peter Dorman, PHILLPS Tue 31 Mar 1998, 02:21 GMT
- Re: Peter Dorman, Peter Dorman Wed 01 Apr 1998, 00:01 GMT
- Re: Peter Dorman, Peter Dorman Wed 01 Apr 1998, 00:38 GMT