PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Lean and mean
> From: knowware@xxxxxxxx (Tom Walker)
> relevant tax here an overtime tax. Define "overtime" as weekly hours worked
> in excess of a standard attained by dividing total labour force hours worked
> by total number of labour force participants (both employed and seeking
> employment). This could be an index the BLS could produce quarterly.
How do you define the social costs of overtime?
Not costs to the worker and employer, mind you,
but to third parties.
That would inform the design of the tax.
MBS
===================================================
Max B. Sawicky Economic Policy Institute
maxsaw@xxxxxxxxx 1660 L Street, NW
202-775-8810 (voice) Ste. 1200
202-775-0819 (fax) Washington, DC 20036
http://tap.epn.org/sawicky
Opinions above do not necessarily reflect the views
of anyone associated with the Economic Policy
Institute other than this writer.
===================================================
- Thread context:
- Lean and mean, (continued)
- Lean and mean,
Tom Walker Sun 11 Jan 1998, 20:21 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Tom Walker Sun 11 Jan 1998, 22:45 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Gar W. Lipow Sun 11 Jan 1998, 23:15 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Tom Walker Mon 12 Jan 1998, 05:22 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Max B. Sawicky Mon 12 Jan 1998, 10:47 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Tom Walker Tue 13 Jan 1998, 08:11 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Max B. Sawicky Tue 13 Jan 1998, 11:00 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Max B. Sawicky Tue 13 Jan 1998, 16:49 GMT
- Re: Lean and mean,
Tom Walker Tue 13 Jan 1998, 18:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]