anti-Microsoft campaign

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: anti-Microsoft campaign
From: john gulick <jlgulick@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:07:19 +0000

What's this I see/read ? Nader teams up with millionare high-tech
executives to condemn Bill Gates and the Microsoft monopoly ? The
CEO of Sun Microsystems issues a ringing defense of the "night
watchman" state, one of its functions being trust-busting (the
others being national defense, civil policing, and judicial protection of
private property rights), and not a peep out of Ralph ? Please inform,
as I am not following this as closely as I probably should, but I
find that what I do know is terribly galling.

John Gulick
Ph. D. Candidate
Sociology Graduate Program
University of California-Santa Cruz
(415) 643-8568
jlgulick@xxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: Book announcement
Next by Date: Commerce Clause Question
Previous by thread: Working-class kitsch
Next by thread: Re: anti-Microsoft campaign
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Query: Parents-children income relationship, (continued)
  - Re: Query: Parents-children income relationship, anzalone/starbird Sun 16 Nov 1997, 02:40 GMT
- Commerce Clause Question, J Cullen Fri 14 Nov 1997, 14:00 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Commerce Clause Question, William S. Lear Fri 14 Nov 1997, 14:25 GMT
  - Re: Commerce Clause Question, Eugene P. Coyle Sat 15 Nov 1997, 01:34 GMT
- anti-Microsoft campaign, john gulick Fri 14 Nov 1997, 13:07 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: anti-Microsoft campaign, Louis Proyect Fri 14 Nov 1997, 21:58 GMT
- Working-class kitsch, valis Fri 14 Nov 1997, 00:41 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Working-class kitsch, tom wood Fri 14 Nov 1997, 21:29 GMT
- Pink Slips, Thomas Kruse Fri 14 Nov 1997, 00:32 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]